[PATCH 0/13] Re: Reintegrate imaplib2 and IDLE, again
nicolas.s-dev at laposte.net
Tue Feb 8 18:06:59 GMT 2011
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 09:44:45AM +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Feb 2011 21:30:21 +0100, Nicolas Sebrecht <nicolas.s-dev at laposte.net> wrote:
> > Please don't think in terms of long-living branches, it's a bad thing
> > for the quality of the code and our workload. Think in terms of
> > long-living experimental/testing features.
> > Notice that this is what's happening for the SQL feature. In some
> > time, I'll even eject that topic from pu. Making the SQL feature an
> > experimental option should not be that hard for now but it is going to
> > be obsolete from the concordance point of view.
> I plan to work on making this an optional feature very soon. I just
> wanted to reduce my stack of clean up patches that has been piling up
> since November first (and I was very busy family/work-wise), but I will
> work on making the sqlite db available as an optional configurable
> status db soon.
Nice! Good to hear you!
More information about the OfflineIMAP-project