[PATCH] Re: Fix gssapi with multiple connections
sjh at foolishpride.org
Tue Jun 14 17:50:00 BST 2011
Do I need the signed off line in the patch, or is here fine? If here is
Signedoff-By: Scott Henson <sjh at foolishpride.org>
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 4:29 AM, Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian at sspaeth.de>wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:54:40 +0200, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 05:04:52PM -0400, sjh at foolishpride.org wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Scott Henson <shenson at redhat.com>
> > >
> > > Fix a gssapi issue where threads beyond the first would not
> > > be able to authenticate against the imap server. This is
> > > done by using the connection lock around the gssapi
> > > authentication code and resetting (and releasing) the
> > > kerberos state after success so that subsequent connections
> > > may make use of kerberos.
> > This patch is missing a sign-off-by line.
> Hi Scott,
> your patch is wonderful and fixing a real issue, we would love to
> incorporate it into mainline.
> However, our project requires a Signed-off-by: line to be able to
> integrate patches. Care to reply(-all) to this mail and sending the
> signed off for your abovementioned patch?
> It would be a pity to lose the patch.
> OfflineIMAP-project mailing list
> OfflineIMAP-project at lists.alioth.debian.org
> OfflineIMAP homepage: http://software.complete.org/offlineimap
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the OfflineIMAP-project