syncing custom IMAP flags
Dan Christensen
jdc at uwo.ca
Tue Mar 15 14:57:22 GMT 2011
Regarding 0243589257baaf in pu:
Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian at SSpaeth.de> writes:
> On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 10:12:02 -0500, Dan Christensen <jdc at uwo.ca> wrote:
>> The patch is simply logical code clean-up: instead of repeating a
>> mapping table twice, once for each direction, it is only stored once.
>> This is safer and faster. So I think you should merge it.
>
> I had a look at the patch and it seems to be indeed this: a cleanup
> without functional changes.
>
> One flagmap rather than two. So this would get a
>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian at SSpaeth.de>
>
> From me.
Has this been merged into a released version yet? Once it has, I plan
on upgrading from 6.2.0 to do some testing.
I guess I should also formally do:
Signed-off-by: Dan Christensen <jdc at uwo.ca>
Thanks,
Dan
More information about the OfflineIMAP-project
mailing list