syncing custom IMAP flags

Dan Christensen jdc at
Tue Mar 15 14:57:22 GMT 2011

Regarding 0243589257baaf in pu:

Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian at> writes:

> On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 10:12:02 -0500, Dan Christensen <jdc at> wrote:
>> The patch is simply logical code clean-up:  instead of repeating a
>> mapping table twice, once for each direction, it is only stored once.
>> This is safer and faster.  So I think you should merge it.
> I had a look at the patch and it seems to be indeed this: a cleanup
> without functional changes.
> One flagmap rather than two. So this would get a 
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian at>
> From me.

Has this been merged into a released version yet?  Once it has, I plan
on upgrading from 6.2.0 to do some testing.

I guess I should also formally do:

Signed-off-by: Dan Christensen <jdc at>



More information about the OfflineIMAP-project mailing list