'Safe Harbor' version of offlineimap

Dave Abrahams dave at boostpro.com
Sun Jul 1 23:56:52 BST 2012

on Wed Jun 13 2012, Sriram Karra <karra.etc-AT-gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Konrad Hinsen <konrad.hinsen at fastmail.net> wrote:
>     Daniel P. Wright writes:
>     > Sorry to dig up an old thread -- I was just wondering if you got
>     > anywhere with this?
>     Not really. I ended up doing what you envisage as well: go back
>     to an older version of offlineimap.
> While there are undeniably some serious stability issues with
> offlineimap in recent times, it is quite a valuable tool for many; I
> am loathe to abandon offlineimap because of any transitory quality
> issues.
> I wonder if we can ascertain the 'last best version' which appears to
> work for most loyal users, where most of us can park ourselves while
> Sebastien and others can figure out the quality issues.

+1000.  I am just about to get rid of offlineimap and my colleague John
Wiegley has recently done the same because it has been messing up our
emails.  This is terrible.

Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing

More information about the OfflineIMAP-project mailing list