'Safe Harbor' version of offlineimap
dave at boostpro.com
Thu Jul 5 16:08:58 BST 2012
on Thu Jul 05 2012, Sriram Karra <karra.etc-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 4:26 AM, Dave Abrahams <dave at boostpro.com> wrote:
> > I wonder if we can ascertain the 'last best version' which appears to
> > work for most loyal users, where most of us can park ourselves while
> > Sebastien and others can figure out the quality issues.
> +1000. I am just about to get rid of offlineimap and my colleague John
> Wiegley has recently done the same because it has been messing up our
> emails. This is terrible.
> Looking back at the responses to this thread, I feel we can say it is
> best to stick to 6.5.1[.x] if you can live with the issues that have
> been fixed since then. There have been hangs reported (I face them
> too) but nothing that a kill -9 cannot fix :-)
Well, OK, that's a starting point.
But take a look at
differences between v126.96.36.199 and v6.5.2). Isn't it a bit hard to
imagine those changes broke anything that matters?
More information about the OfflineIMAP-project