Server responded: ('NO', ['[ALREADYEXISTS] Duplicate folder name?(Failure)'])

[Thomas Kahle]

On 13:08 Wed 02 May 2012, Alexander Søndergaard wrote:
> Ok, I now found the issue, my nametrans was fine but:
> 
> "every nametrans setting on a remote repository requires an equivalent
> nametrans rule on the local repository that reverses the
> transformation"

Good!  But this was introduced long before the 6.5 series...



> 
> Thanks,
> 
> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Thomas Kahle <tomka at gentoo.org> wrote:
> > On 08:55 Wed 02 May 2012, Alex Søndergaard wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> > I seem to have sorted this out, so no need for anyone to waste time
> >> > replying. Apologies for the noise.
> >>
> >> how did you sort out this issue?
> >>
> >> I've just upgraded from 6.5.3 to 6.5.3.1 and I'm encountering the same issue. It
> >> seems to be related to nametrans, but my configuration hasn't changed...
> >
> > Triplecheck your nametrans rules (I mean: play around with the functions
> > in a python shell!).  It seems like some not entirely correct functions
> > where accepted before:
> >
> > (from Changelog)
> >
> > -) Fixed some cases where invalid nametrans rules were not caught and we
> > would not propagate local folders to the remote repository. (now tested
> > in test03)
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Thomas
> >
> >
> > --
> > Thomas Kahle
> > http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/

-- 
Thomas Kahle
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 316 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/offlineimap-project/attachments/20120502/fc34996e/attachment.pgp>