more on maildir modification times!
janna.martl109 at gmail.com
Thu Mar 26 01:12:30 GMT 2015
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 04:17:24PM +0100, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
> My bad, I forgot about that. Well to make it clear, it's wrong to update
> the modification times of the files for the purpose of fixing maxage.
> In fact, I wonder if I should revert the whole patch (25513e90387f60).
I agree that this will no longer be necessary once we get the min_uid thing
straightened out. (Though the edge case it fixed -- messages that are
downloaded much later than they are retrieved on the IMAP server --
could still cause too many messages to be synced (its UID is too small
given its date, so it will end up as min_uid). This is not as bad as
messing up file modification times, though. Maybe we could get the
filename right and not mess up the modification time?)
More information about the OfflineIMAP-project