wxl at polka.bike
Mon Nov 27 20:04:21 GMT 2017
On 2017-11-27 11:51, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 09:32:53AM -0800, Walter Lapchynski wrote:
>> Well in this case, it would have been glaringly obvious to me that the
>> version I have doesn't support XOAUTH2 if it had simply reported back
>> that it didn't know what I was talking about. So doesn't there seem like
>> it would add a benefit that's not there?
> This would add a benefit. The good question is: would it add enough
> benefit to worth the trouble (associated bugs, complexity in the code,
There's only one way to find out, no?
@wxl | polka.bike
C563 CAC5 8BE1 2F22 A49D
68F6 8B57 A48B C4F2 051A
More information about the OfflineIMAP-project