[Openstack-devel] sync Ceph packaging efforts for Debian/Ubuntu
sage at inktank.com
Sat Jun 16 16:00:09 UTC 2012
On Sat, 16 Jun 2012, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote:
> Hi all parties,
> Ceph is packaged at three places: in Ubuntu, at upstream and in Debian.
> Its first 'stable' release, 0.48 is coming. At least as Sage wrote some
> days ago: "It looks like 0.48 will also be the basis for one of our
> first 'stable' releases.".
> Hereby I would like to sync our Debian related packaging efforts, not
> only for the mentioned stable release. The OpenStack packaging team
> would like to add Ceph to their stack. Howtos, helping hands on forums
> needs it as well.
> I'm not subscribed to the lists, please keep me in the loop with Cc-s.
> First patch, 0002-Add-support-PPC.patch is for upstream. Would help the
> in tree leveldb to build on PowerPC architectures as well.
> Second patch reflect the homepage and git tree changes for Ubuntu.
> Third patch is from them, noted as "Switch from libcryptopp to libnss as
> libcryptopp is not seeded.". So libnss3-dev is used as build-dependency
> instead. Sage, would you commit it?
I haven't looked closely yet, but these should be fine.
> I've separated gceph out, if someone needs the CLI only, then s/he can
> do that without the GTK+ libraries. See below.
gceph is already gone from the 'next' branch.
> Ben, James, can you please share in some sentences why ceph-fuse is
> dropped in Ubuntu? Do you need it Sage? If it's feasible, you may drop
> that as well.
We could package it separately, if necessary, but it should be packaged.
> As I see, you still ship d/librgw1.install , d/librgw1.postrm ,
> d/librgw1.postinst and librgw-dev.install . They are not needed anymore.
These are already gone from the 'next' branch as well.
> Maybe the biggest change is that ceph-mds was separated out and such,
> ceph-fs-common created for cephfs and mount.ceph.
We can do this as well, but I would prefer not to. Opinions?
> Please move the configure call to its target, as you can check in git.
> Add var/lib/ceph/mon , var/lib/ceph/osd and var/lib/ceph/mds to
> d/ceph.dirs .
This should be done in 'next'.
> git patch is for Sage, upstream and contains what needed for the new
> packages. May I get commit rights to debian/ or should I go with git
> forks and you'll merge the changes?
Patches or a git merge request are best as they allow for review.
Thanks, Laszlo! Looking forward to seeing this in wheezy, and easing the
burden on you and the Ubuntu guys.
> Also it seems that limit the architectures to build on is not
> allowed. I'll write an email to this issue, how to go with failing
> leveldb build-dependency on some archs.
> Loic, do you need anything or do you have any objections with these
>  http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677626
More information about the Openstack-devel