[Openstack-devel] nova_2013.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
ftpmaster at debian.org
Wed Apr 10 09:00:19 UTC 2013
these are the contents of the nova-conductor binary:
-rw-r--r-- root/root 107 2013-04-10 05:43 ./etc/logrotate.d/nova-conductor
-rwxr-xr-x root/root 2835 2013-04-09 06:33 ./etc/init.d/nova-conductor
-rw-r--r-- root/root 751 2013-04-10 05:43 ./usr/share/man/man1/nova-conductor.1.gz
-rwxr-xr-x root/root 1792 2013-04-10 05:43 ./usr/bin/nova-conductor
-rw-r--r-- root/root 8650 2013-04-09 06:33 ./usr/share/doc/nova-conductor/changelog.Debian.gz
-rw-r--r-- root/root 3833 2013-04-09 06:33 ./usr/share/doc/nova-conductor/copyright
total (all files): 17968
-rw-r--r-- root/root 1390786 2013-04-09 06:33 ./usr/share/doc/nova-conductor/changelog.gz
The upstream changelog is 77 times the size of the remaining files. If I didn't
include the Debian changelog this would look even worse.
The same to applies to the other new binary packages (I did not check the others).
The upstream changelog should just be included in at most one binary package,
for example either nova-doc or nova-common. With such a large changelog it is
not useful to include it everywhere. I'll reject the package for this reason.
I'm also wondering if it's really required to split everything into seperate
packages? There's only only a few kilobytes of content in each package and they
share the same dependencies as well.
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
More information about the Openstack-devel