[Openstack-devel] dropping essex from wheezy?
Julien Cristau
jcristau at debian.org
Tue Sep 24 14:02:37 UTC 2013
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 10:29:34 -0300, gustavo panizzo <gfa> wrote:
> hello folks
>
> i would like to propose the elimination of essex from wheezy, our
> current stable release.
>
You should have thought of that before getting it in a stable release.
At this point it's just not reasonable IMO.
> - it's security maintenance is a pain, i've tried to backport some fixes
> but a year, or more, in openstack is a lot. many fixes are not easily
> back ported.
>
I don't think this matters much. You wouldn't base a public cloud on
that version anyway, and most of the security fixes aren't really all
that important in a private/internal environment.
> if we chose the "make our own patch" way, is really hard to test it.
> you can create a test for the patch. but real world testing is almost
> impossible (does anybody run an essex install?)
>
I run one. (Thinking of upgrading it, but that's going to take a while,
especially without a proper upgrade path.)
Cheers,
Julien
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/openstack-devel/attachments/20130924/f1ba0dab/attachment.sig>
More information about the Openstack-devel
mailing list