[PKG-Openstack-devel] Comments regarding python-oslo.versionedobjects_0.1.1-1_amd64.changes

[Thomas Goirand]

I would prefer to wait for qpid support for Python 3. There's an ongoing effort for this upstream, it should be ready soonish.

Thomas

On May 3, 2015 8:57 PM, Gaudenz Steinlin <gaudenz at debian.org> wrote:
>
>
> Hi 
>
> Thomas Goirand <thomas at goirand.fr> writes: 
>
> > On 05/02/2015 05:47 PM, Paul Richards Tagliamonte wrote: 
> >> Upstream claims Python 3 support, you did all the work but 
> >> left it commented. I'll file a bug after this clears. 
> > 
> > Yeah... claims... That's the word. 
> > 
> > By hart, because I'm trying to fix the issue: 
> > - python-oslo.versionedobject dpeends on python-oslo.messaging 
> > - python-oslo.messaging depends on python-qpid 
> > - python-qpid is the stupid one which doesn't have Python 3 support yet 
> > (but there's a porting effort for it...), and which some RedHat folks 
> > insist on keeping. 
> > 
> > Get qpid and saml2 to understand Python 3, and a huge amount of package 
> > that I maintain can suddenly get Python 3 support! :) 
>
> Can't we just not support qpid as the message broker in Debian? I never 
> heard of anyone using it. 
>
> Gaudenz