[parted-devel] Darcs performance (mainly memory usage)

David Cantrell dcantrell at redhat.com
Sun Nov 19 20:38:28 CET 2006


leslie.polzer at gmx.net wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 12:54:39PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> 
>> If we choose to use git, I can do the migration on monday.
> Does anyone object to replacing darcs by git?  If no one does,
> I would like to accept your offer.
> 
>   I'm thinking about renting a full server, but that might take some
> time, and I don't like that developement would be stalled until then.

I don't object.  We've got some VCS research going on at RH and git 
seems to be the winner for many projects with mercurial following close 
behind.  We are seeing the same lousy performance with the various darcs 
repos we've set up.

If we need server space, I can offer resources through my company.

-- 
David Cantrell
Red Hat / Westford, MA



More information about the parted-devel mailing list