[parted-devel] eliminating switch vs. enum warnings

[Otavio Salvador]

Otavio Salvador <otavio at debian.org> writes:

> Jim Meyering <jim at meyering.net> writes:
>
>> Do you mean the FAT_TYPE_FAT12 case *is* a "should not happen" case?
>> Are you sure?  If so, I'll be happy to add the following for all of those:
>>
>>                 case FAT_TYPE_FAT12:
>>                 PED_ASSERT (0, (void) 0);
>>                 break;
>
> I checked both the parted fat source and the linux fat source and
> hadn't identified what's the right values to put for FAT12 hence I
> think we might raise an exception instead of continue to work in that
> case. Doing that would allow us to know if someone tries to use parted
> in this specific case or not.

Ignore this part since you already found the right information.

-- 
        O T A V I O    S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
 E-mail: otavio at debian.org      UIN: 5906116
 GNU/Linux User: 239058     GPG ID: 49A5F855
 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives
 you the whole house."