[parted-devel] avoid printf, when easy to do
Otavio Salvador
otavio at debian.org
Wed Mar 7 20:54:41 CET 2007
"Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray" <debarshi.ray at gmail.com> writes:
> Some more printf-like functions replaced by fputs, puts and putchar. I
> have tried to avoid any re-formatting than what was absolutely
> necessary to preserve the formatting of the code after making the
> changes.
>
> Comments?
Some comments.
> --- a/libparted/fs/ext2/ext2_inode_relocator.c
> +++ b/libparted/fs/ext2/ext2_inode_relocator.c
> @@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ static int doscan(struct ext2_fs *fs, struct ext2_inode_relocator_state *state)
> }
>
> if (fs->opt_verbose)
> - fprintf(stderr, "\n");
> + fputc ('\n', stderr);
I don't know if we should or not also change the indentation on the
changed lines. I'm ok with it but I would like to hear from the others
too.
There're a lot of indentation changes on the patch.
> --- a/libparted/fs/ext2/ext2_resize.c
> +++ b/libparted/fs/ext2/ext2_resize.c
> @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
> */
>
> #include <config.h>
> -
> +v
> #ifndef DISCOVER_ONLY
>
> #include <stdio.h>
I bet it won't compile ;-)
--
O T A V I O S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
E-mail: otavio at debian.org UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives
you the whole house."
More information about the parted-devel
mailing list