[parted-devel] release plan of parted 1.8.9

[Mike Hwang]

==13891== 80 bytes in 4 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 14 of
35
==13891==    at 0x40214E5: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:149)
==13891==    by 0x80D6884: ped_malloc (libparted.c:234)
==13891==    by 0x81165CB: _disk_sync_part_table (linux.c:2216)
==13891==    by 0x8116EEC: linux_disk_commit (linux.c:2514)
==13891==    by 0x80D8B23: ped_disk_commit_to_os (disk.c:445)

int*    rets = ped_malloc(sizeof(int) * last);  (linux.c:2216)

On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 11:10 +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:

> Mike Hwang <Mike.Hwang at iqstor.com.cn> wrote:
> > Hi Jim,
> >
> > I am the person who created ticket 47
> > http://parted.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/trac.cgi/ticket/47
> 
> Hi Mike,
> 
> Thanks for reporting that.
> Can you reproduce the leak with the latest from git?
> 
> >>From the git source code, I could see that you have fixed many memory
> > leaks. Do you know the release plan of 1.8.9?
> > I am writing a daemon which depends on libparted 1.8.7, and there are
> > many memory leaks in this version.
> 
> We've been discussing making a release, and it may be
> within the next couple of months.  No set date yet, though.
> 
> Is your daemon code freely available?
> I'd like to start maintaining a list of projects that use parted.
> 

-- 
Mike Hwang

http://www.iqstor.com
Phone: 62974477-612
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/parted-devel/attachments/20080730/d90a3999/attachment.htm