No subject
Tue Apr 21 15:07:30 UTC 2009
should be treated as a case where we cannot detect the partition table
type.
Moreover the code tells me that we are detecting a loop label that
satisfies one of two conditions: 1. The condition expressed above and 2.
when the device has the "GNU Parted Loopback 0" string. To me these two
situations seem rather exclusive and should not be treated in the same
way.
I'll keep investigating and get back to the list when I have more info.
Any suggestions/explinations are greatly appreciated.
Regards.
--
Joel Andres Granados
Brno, Czech Republic, Red Hat.
More information about the parted-devel
mailing list