[parted-devel] Parted Stuff that needs fixing before 1.8.9

[Joel Granados]

On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 04:38:15PM +0200, Joel Granados wrote:
> Some comments on two issues.  I share them with the list now, so I don't
> forget in the near future when I am posting all the patches for the
> bugs.
> 
> 
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 11:28:15AM +0200, Joel Granados wrote:
> > Hello list.
> > 
> > In my continuing effort to make 1.8.9 happen I have decided to make a
> > summary of what needs to be fixed for 1.8.9.  The idea is for 1.8.9 to
> > be released when all these issues have been resolved.  If I miss any
> > bugs issues that are important to someone, feel free to scream at me :)
> > 
> > Stuff for 1.8.9
> > 1. Do not clobber the BootCode in GPT PMBRs
> >     - http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/parted-devel/2008-December/002473.html
> >     - http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-parted/2008-12/msg00015.html
> > 
> > 2. Patch: Fix gpt_read to read all of the partition entries correctly
> >     - http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/parted-devel/2008-December/002465.html
> >     - http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/parted-devel/attachments/20081202/b7c0528d/attachment.txt
> > 
> > 3. [PATCH] fix for mklabel in parted
> >     - http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/parted-devel/2009-January/002739.html
> > 
> > 4. [parted-devel] Error on resize FAT16 with 64k cluster
> >     - http://parted.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/trac.cgi/ticket/207
> >     * This one needs testing.  There is a nice test in the link above.
> 
> This turned out to be a reproducible error.  I spent a considerable
> amount of time trying to come up with a test related to this issue. My
> approach was to create a device-mapper device and try to reproduce what
> I had seen in test with "real" devices.  Since parted has a different
> code path with device-mapper devices, this was not possible.
> With this in mind I decided not to create any test for this patch.
> 
> > 
> > 5. Unable to satisfy all constraints on the partition after fix
> >         partition order with fdisk
> >     - http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-parted/2009-03/msg00009.html
> >     * This one needs testing.  The link above contains info.
> 
> I could not reproduce this one.  To the best of my knowledge it should
> already be addressed as the reporter is using a parted version that is
> oldish.
> 
> 
> Still 6 issues to go.  I will hopefully finish them by the end of the
> week and we can begin the 1.8.9 release process.

Sorry 1.9.0

> 
> > 
> > 6. [parted-devel] [PATCH] backlist md devices from device list
> >     - http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/parted-devel/2009-April/002781.html
> > 
> > 7. [parted-devel] [PATCH] document that primary keyword is not supported on sun label
> >     - http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/parted-devel/2009-April/002782.html
> > 
> > 8. New Italian PO file for 'parted' (version 1.8.8)
> >     - http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-parted/2009-01/msg00010.html
> >     * This one needs no action.  bootstrap takes care of this
> >       automatically 
> > 
> > 9. ignore the filesystem
> >     - http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-parted/2009-02/msg00009.html
> >     * It needs testing.  No testing available AFAIK.
> > 
> > 10. parted detects reiserfs root partition as linux-swap
> >     - http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-parted/2009-05/msg00006.html
> >     * Also needs test and has no patch.  I think its worth
> >       investigating.
> > 
> 
> Regards.
> 
> -- 
> Joel Andres Granados
> Brno, Czech Republic, Red Hat.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> parted-devel mailing list
> parted-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/parted-devel

-- 
Joel Andres Granados
Brno, Czech Republic, Red Hat.