[parted-devel] [PATCH] master branch

Joel Granados Moreno jgranado at redhat.com
Wed Jun 3 18:36:54 UTC 2009


Hello list

In the ongoing effort to solve the mailing-list bugs...

This patchset contains stuff from Petr Uzel and  Matthew S. Harris.  I
belive, in Petr's case I did not change anything from hi original post
(after some review) to the list.  I _did_ do some little changes to
Matthew's patch (hope you don't mind)

I'm pretty sure that the last patch needs some work.  ATM it tests
correctly, but I would like to see something more genering.  I post it
to the list so ppl can comment.  Questions arised from this patch
related to the mdadm command.  Is that the right way to test the
presense of the command?  Should we have a dm libraty? is the lvm-lib.sh
file the dm library? should this file be renamed to something more
generic, like dm-library?

Also, and relating the patchset to what has been discussed with Jim
about the comments, should we start commenting the functions that have
no documentation (like the _skip_entry) function in
libparted/arch/linux.c?

As always.  Comments and corrections are greatly appreciated.

Regards.

Joel Andres Granados
Brno, Czech Republic, Red Hat.



More information about the parted-devel mailing list