[parted-devel] > 63 heads. Why does this keep coming up?

[Phillip Susi]

On 02/12/2011 05:05 PM, Phillip Susi wrote:
> I have patched the function to not use PED_ASSERT() so it properly
> returns 0 when the constraints fail. This seems to fix the issue. Please
> review for application:

Does anyone else ( Jim? ) have a comment on this patch, or why 
PED_ASSERT() does not seem to work properly?  Specifically why it 
ignores its second argument that the original code seems to assume will 
be executed instead of calling exit()?  Understanding that will help 
explain why this patch is needed, then if there are no objections, it 
could be applied?