[parted-devel] Problem with Linux "3.0"

H. Peter Anvin hpa at zytor.com
Tue Jun 7 16:31:07 UTC 2011


On 06/07/2011 09:27 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> 
> However, I don't want to ignore the return value.
> 
> How about the patch below?
> I left your name on it.
> Let me know if that's ok.
> 

assert (n >= 2);

... would be more succinct to me and more future-proof, but that's just
stylistic...

	-hpa
-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.




More information about the parted-devel mailing list