[parted-devel] Problem with Linux "3.0"
H. Peter Anvin
hpa at zytor.com
Tue Jun 7 16:31:07 UTC 2011
On 06/07/2011 09:27 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>
> However, I don't want to ignore the return value.
>
> How about the patch below?
> I left your name on it.
> Let me know if that's ok.
>
assert (n >= 2);
... would be more succinct to me and more future-proof, but that's just
stylistic...
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
More information about the parted-devel
mailing list