[parted-devel] [PATCH 0/4] Add ability to set GPT PMBR boot flag

Keshav P R the.ridikulus.rat at gmail.com
Sat Jan 28 19:48:39 UTC 2012


On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 00:44, Phillip Susi <psusi at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 01/28/2012 01:23 PM, Brian C. Lane wrote:
>> We can't know for certain that there are not BIOS's that check to make
>> sure it isn't set. Since that is how the spec was written it is possible
>> that such a BIOS exists.
>
> I'm pretty sure we can actually, since such a bios wouldn't be able to boot Windows, or at least some Linux distributions that go ahead and set the flag because some bioses won't boot without it.  If such a bios were released, not being able to boot the de facto standard PC OS certainly would result in it being fixed very quickly.
>

The issue here is the UEFI spec specifically mentions "boot/active
flag should not be set on the 0xEE entry in PMBR. Any firmware that
*strictly* complies with the spec will ignore the drive or show
errors.

>> It would be alot easier to just set it, but then what do we do if we
>> find out that there are others expect it to be clear?
>
> Theoretically, then you would need to add a flag to switch it off.
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPJEkzAAoJEJrBOlT6nu751JUH/15b+v1Sn0fi/JeEh7L0Op+W
> nPhPlLNY0PTPgEsD+b1VU1532Myi65RzbZ90exX7CZlpxWdq9XWWkQXAydrZc4XH
> Y9xUepLnWUbYWtiPo4aU4294DZQE8CyGu4k791iEsULypC+RJIt/RqHmdG3oawJM
> KnRLcHo165Rfi+Vekrhz90jdOwSTnpHvwNI/fB0WNnzMD1MwReYET+00TAFJvpnE
> 3vhwdAFqVUClP9cma4SmT+rsn7TVQH7UNDGngtgnxjRMZRobkkRSldc7NxdmQfc1
> o1VTv7/NIj1kQrgZ2nRXHojsXUkGJsuV1ZCsCxNj2kovSjpsYiNdszOgBogV0+k=
> =Q88d
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>



More information about the parted-devel mailing list