[parted-devel] [PATCH] tests: Add udevadm settle to wait_for_ loop (#1260664)
Brian C. Lane
bcl at redhat.com
Tue Apr 12 20:58:30 UTC 2016
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 08:58:10PM -0400, Phillip Susi wrote:
> On 03/01/2016 04:45 PM, Brian C. Lane wrote:
> > Sometimes the device will vanish after the wait_for_dev_to_appear
> > exits. Add udevadm settle in an attempt to make sure the udev
> > system is done flapping around and the device will stay in place.
> >
> > Related: rhbz#1260664 --- tests/t-lib-helpers.sh | 2 ++
> > tests/t-local.sh | 2 ++ tests/t6001-psep.sh
> > | 2 ++ tests/t6004-dm-many-partitions.sh | 1 +
> > tests/t6005-dm-uuid.sh | 2 ++
> > tests/t6100-mdraid-partitions.sh | 1 + 6 files changed, 10
> > insertions(+)
>
> Why add the require_udevadm_settle to these 4 specific tests? Other
> tests call wait_for_dev_to_appear. Don't they need it to? Shouldn't
> the require be added to t-lib-helpers or somesuch to require it for
> all tests that call wait_for_dev_to_appear?
The other users already pull it in via require_scsi_debug_module_,
although it looks like I missed t6004 somehow, it needs it as well.
There's no way to add a generic check to t-lib-helpers, since we want to
skip tests early if it isn't available.
Although the other option is to made the settle a library call, and if
udevadm isn't available have it be a noop instead of skip. I'm not sure
if there are any distributions using parted that don't use udev though,
so that might be completely pointless.
--
Brian C. Lane | Anaconda Team | IRC: bcl #anaconda | Port Orchard, WA (PST8PDT)
More information about the parted-devel
mailing list