[Parted-maintainers] Bug#276887: libparted1.6-0: can't fulfill the Recommends in sarge

Sven Luther Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>, 276887@bugs.debian.org
Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:40:58 +0200


On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 02:18:20PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 02:22:04PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 17, 2004 at 11:40:53PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 17, 2004 at 11:48:43PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Oct 17, 2004 at 12:54:14PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > > > Package: libparted1.6-0
> > > > > Version: 1.6.11-6
> > > > > Severity: serious
> > > > > Tags: sarge
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > The recommends on libreiserfs0.3-0 can't be fulfilled in sarge.
> > > > 
> > > > Well, the description says :
> > > > 
> > > >   + Note that ReiserFS support is only enabled if you install
> > > >   + the libreiserfs0.3-0 package. Since libreiserfs0.3-0 has been
> > > >   + removed from sarge, ReiserFS support is not compiled in the
> > > >   + default package.
> > > > 
> > > > Is that not clear enough ? It is not a dependency nor build-dependency
> > > > anymore, and this should most assuredly be enough ? Mmm, maybe i could just as
> > > 
> > > A package management tool can handle Recommends like Depends to help 
> > > users (and section 2.2.1. of your policy treats Recommends similar to 
> > > Depends and Build-Depends).
> > 
> > So, a Suggest would be ok then ? 
> 
> It would fix this bug.
> 
> But unless parted was compiled with libreiserfs, it seems the 
> libreiserfs0.3-0 package wouldn't help the user. I'd therefore simply 
> drop the recommends until at some time there might be a build dependency 
> on libreiserfs again.

Yeah, that is what i was thinking yesterday.

Friendly,

Sven Luther