[Parted-maintainers] Bug#1103454: libparted detects ext4 without journal as ext2
Colin Watson
cjwatson at debian.org
Sat May 31 23:59:29 BST 2025
On Sat, May 31, 2025 at 09:53:13AM +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
>On 30/05/2025 at 13:01, Colin Watson wrote:
>>If it's a non-trivial bug, why did you file it as Severity: minor?
>>https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities - "a problem which
>>doesn't affect the package's usefulness, and is presumably trivial
>>to fix". It's usually for things like typos.
>
>I am no expert in bug severity assessment, and it seems to me that the
>bug matches the above definition quite well: it does not affect
>parted's overall usefulness, affects only uncommon use cases (d-i +
>ext4 without journal) and is rather trivial to fix (reorder filesystem
>feature checks).
The thing is that it's inconsistent to both say it's minor, and also
push for it to be fixed in trixie (where only fixes for >= important
bugs are allowed at this point in key packages). If you're asking me to
apply for a freeze exception from the release team, they're not likely
to be impressed by a minor bug.
If you're arguing that it meets the definition of important ("a bug
which has a major effect on the usability of a package, without
rendering it completely unusable to everyone"), that would be a
different matter. Is that the case? I might be willing to cherry-pick
the patch from upstream if the argument is that the bug should actually
have a higher severity.
(I'm not just being pedantic here - at the moment there's no point in me
spending time on things the release team is just going to reject.)
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwatson at debian.org]
More information about the Parted-maintainers
mailing list