Bug#552052: lintian: add perl-modules to list of obsolete packages

gregor herrmann gregoa at debian.org
Fri Jan 1 23:43:35 UTC 2010


On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 22:49:19 +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:

> In fact, based on Don's concerns and the discussion on debian-devel [1]
> it looks like we're going to back away from the perl+perl-modules merge.

Ok.
 
> However, I think there is a point in discouraging direct dependencies
> on perl-modules. [..]
> Therefore I think that the perl/perl-modules split should be considered
> an internal implementation detail of the perl source package, and other
> packages should only depend on perl (or some specified versions of
> perl-base, in exceptional circumstances.)

Makes sense to me.
 
> The first steps to this would be just a change to the perl-modules
> long description and a lintian warning triggering on the 150 or so
> packages currently (build-)depending on perl-modules. 

The ones maintained by the perl group are already changed (at least
in svn), and dh-make-perl also just uses "perl" already.

> Changing 150 packages won't happen overnight but there's no particular
> hurry with it and I think the remaining dependencies could be filed
> at some point as minor bugs.

Ack.
 

Cheers,
gregor
 
-- 
 .''`.   http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG Key IDs: 0x00F3CFE4, 0x8649AA06
 : :' :  Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'   Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-    NP: U2: Where The Streets Have No Name
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/perl-maintainers/attachments/20100102/7b55f093/attachment.pgp>


More information about the Perl-maintainers mailing list