[Piuparts-devel] Bug#573904: Bug#573904: Bug#573904:

[Holger Levsen]

Hey,

On Mittwoch, 21. April 2010, Cleto Martin Angelina wrote:
> Yeah... me too. Resetting the previous value of umask is just a
> prevention decision because through the program code a lot of files
> and directories are created. It is necessary to study if other
> files/directories depends on concrete permissions so that a custom
> umask value would corrupt them. For all these reasons, I think current
> patch is a good solution.
>
> I have to read more slowly the piuparts code to understand it better,
> so I'll take a look to this issue.

Thanks already! ;-)


cheers,
	Holger
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/piuparts-devel/attachments/20100421/a7ba596b/attachment.pgp>