[Piuparts-devel] New debsums behavior

[Dave Steele]

On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Dave Steele <dsteele at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> A quick Google search suggests that this is a debsums problem:
>
>   http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2006840&p=12040623#post12040623

Also see
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debsums/+bug/809924/comments/7

Comment #8 at that page says the 'new' Debian (on 2011-09-06) fixes it.


On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Dave Steele <dsteele at gmail.com> wrote:
> The debsums redirect problem has been replaced with the following, for
> some of the affected packages:
>
> http://piuparts.debian.org/sid2experimental/fail/libglib2.0-0_2.36.0-2.log
>
> 1m24.3s DEBUG: Starting command: ['debsums', '--root',
> '/org/piuparts.debian.org/tmp/tmpXH7ERs', '-ac']
> 1m24.5s DUMP:
>   dpkg-query: file triggers record mentions illegal package name
> `libglib2.0-0:amd64' (for interest in file
> `/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gio/modules'): character `:' not allowed
> (only letters, digits and characters `-+._')
>   debsums: dpkg-query
> --admindir=/org/piuparts.debian.org/tmp/tmpXH7ERs/var/lib/dpkg
> --showformat=${Package}
>
>   ${PackageSpec}
>
>   ${binary:Package}
>
>   ${Version}
>
>   ${Status}
>
>   ${Conffiles}
>
>   ${Replaces}
>
>
> A quick Google search suggests that this is a debsums problem:
>
>   http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2006840&p=12040623#post12040623
>
> If so, the problem is still in the piuparts testing environment.
> Otherwise, libglib2.0-0 should be rescheduled in sid.
>
> libglib2.0-0 has 1800 reverse dependencies.