[Piuparts-devel] pejacevic vs piatti
Andreas Beckmann
anbe at debian.org
Mon May 13 12:08:53 UTC 2013
On 2013-05-13 13:07, Holger Levsen wrote:
> So now I wonder, if we should go with that branchname, keep using piatti or
> choose another one. Idea opinions about this bikeshed?
git checkout -b bikeshed
not to confuse with bikeshed/PPA/DPA/...
is there any reason to have separate configs for pejavecic and
slave-0-8-15? for now a symlink should be sufficient
Andreas
PS: typo noticed, I'll try again to spell it correctly next time
More information about the Piuparts-devel
mailing list