[Piuparts-devel] pejacevic vs piatti

Andreas Beckmann anbe at debian.org
Mon May 13 12:08:53 UTC 2013


On 2013-05-13 13:07, Holger Levsen wrote:
> So now I wonder, if we should go with that branchname, keep using piatti or 
> choose another one. Idea opinions about this bikeshed?

git checkout -b bikeshed

not to confuse with bikeshed/PPA/DPA/...

is there any reason to have separate configs for pejavecic and
slave-0-8-15? for now a symlink should be sufficient

Andreas

PS: typo noticed, I'll try again to spell it correctly next time



More information about the Piuparts-devel mailing list