[Piuparts-devel] LogDB refactoring

[Holger Levsen]

Hi,

On Sonntag, 26. Mai 2013, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> I would like to chnage this to have
> the explicit sequence in the logfile name,

I don't. If this is done, why not encode the test result(s) in the logfile 
name as well? ;-)

> although I'm not sure how to
> actually do this, e.g. ${pkg}_${ver1}_${ver2}_${ver3}.log
> That should simplify rerunning the test whenever one of the versions
> changes. And request an explicit upgrade path from the slave.
> As a special value the string "None" is used to indicate that the package
> does not exist in a distro.
> Primary use case: A2bpo2B.

Yes, but then these filenames also become really long and ugly. I'd rather 
have this information encoded in the first line of the logfile or something.


cheers,
	Holger
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 828 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/piuparts-devel/attachments/20130527/1be212ca/attachment.pgp>