[Piuparts-devel] Bug#744398: why should debsums care about obsolete conffiles?

Holger Levsen holger at layer-acht.org
Mon Apr 28 14:59:27 UTC 2014


Hi,

On Montag, 28. April 2014, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> On Saturday 26 April 2014 03:39:57 Axel Beckert wrote:
> > Ryan is also a member, so he could
> > easily continue to contribute while it would benefit from team
> > maintenance.
> 
> Ryan has been mostly inactive for quite a while. Most of his non-team
> packages are out of date.
> 
> Note that I would be very happy to be proven wrong...

/me nods. 

So I've just deployed the fix on the piuparts slave host (simply dropped it in 
¨/bin) and scheduled 2300 failed packages for retesting, so this patch will 
get quite some testing now.

If the perl team wouldn't want to take over maintainance, I would prepare 
another NMU. Obviously I would rather see a proper maintainance take over.


cheers,
	Holger




-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 828 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/piuparts-devel/attachments/20140428/089af940/attachment.sig>


More information about the Piuparts-devel mailing list