[Piuparts-devel] Bug#744398: why should debsums care about obsolete conffiles?
Holger Levsen
holger at layer-acht.org
Mon Apr 28 14:59:27 UTC 2014
Hi,
On Montag, 28. April 2014, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> On Saturday 26 April 2014 03:39:57 Axel Beckert wrote:
> > Ryan is also a member, so he could
> > easily continue to contribute while it would benefit from team
> > maintenance.
>
> Ryan has been mostly inactive for quite a while. Most of his non-team
> packages are out of date.
>
> Note that I would be very happy to be proven wrong...
/me nods.
So I've just deployed the fix on the piuparts slave host (simply dropped it in
¨/bin) and scheduled 2300 failed packages for retesting, so this patch will
get quite some testing now.
If the perl team wouldn't want to take over maintainance, I would prepare
another NMU. Obviously I would rather see a proper maintainance take over.
cheers,
Holger
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 828 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/piuparts-devel/attachments/20140428/089af940/attachment.sig>
More information about the Piuparts-devel
mailing list