[Piuparts-devel] Bug#759937: should list inadequate results in source-pkg view too
Holger Levsen
holger at layer-acht.org
Sat Aug 30 21:36:01 UTC 2014
package: piuparts-master
severity: wishlist
x-debbugs-cc: debian-perl at lists.debian.org
Hi Axel,
On Freitag, 29. August 2014, Axel Beckert wrote:
> > > And on the per-maintainer or per-package view, they don't seem to
> > > appear yet: E.g.
> > > https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/bin_or_sbin_binary_requires_usr_lib_lib
> > > rary _inadequate_issue.html lists cifs-utils, but neither
> > > https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/source/c/cifs-utils.html says anything
> > > about this issue nor does
> > > https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/maintainer/p/pkg-samba-maint@lists.alio
> > > th.d ebian.org.html
> > >
> > > So the situation there is definitely suboptimal. Cc'ing the Piuparts
> > > Developers for further input on this.
> >
> > do you think that bin_or_sbin_binary_requires_usr_lib_library should
> > cause a piuparts test failure? IOW: does it at least warrant important
> > bugs, maybe even serious ones?
>
> No, my intention is a different one: Piuparts should list all adequate
> issues on the per-package or per-maintainer to make the maintainers
> aware of these issues. Because that's where the maintainers look for
> their packages. (In addition it would get even more attention if the
> PTS or the new tracker would list them on the package page.)
I agree, thus I'm submitting this bug... Thanks! :)
> Otherwise it can't replace running adequate in autopkgtest tests.
That should indeed happen, as not all packages have autopkgtests...
cheers,
Holger
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 828 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/piuparts-devel/attachments/20140830/4938a0a8/attachment.sig>
More information about the Piuparts-devel
mailing list