[Piuparts-devel] rescheduling needed

[Holger Levsen]

Hi Andreas,

On Samstag, 8. November 2014, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> in fail bugged affected:
> 'No packages found matching piuparts-depends-dummy.deb.'

rescheduled, not many:

squeeze/bugged/ninja_0.1.3-2.log
squeeze/bugged/python3.1_3.1.3-1.log
squeeze/bugged/xfonts-a12k12_1-9.log
 
> the systemd exceptions need to be applied for 'wheezy*', not only for
> 'wheezy'. this needs to cover wheezy-proposed and friends, too
> (PIUPARTS_DISTRIBUTION is not something like wheezy2jessie)

do you (only) mean in line 52 in custom-scripts/scripts/post_purge_exceptions 
?

(not yet applied..)

> (and the package lists could be wrapped ...)

you mean debian/control or which?

> thereafter in fail bugged affected:
> 'Unable to locate package sysvinit-core'

currently these are affected:

squeeze2wheezy-proposed/fail/gdm3_3.4.1-8.log
squeeze2wheezy-proposed/fail/gnome-session_3.4.2.1-4.log
squeeze2wheezy-proposed/fail/kde-plasma-desktop_5:77+deb7u1.log
squeeze2wheezy-proposed/fail/kde-plasma-netbook_5:77+deb7u1.log
squeeze2wheezy-proposed/fail/ltsp-server-standalone_5.4.2-6+deb7u1.log
squeeze2wheezy-proposed/fail/xfswitch-plugin_0.0.1-3+b1.log
wheezy2proposed/fail/gdm3_3.4.1-8.log
wheezy2proposed/fail/gnome-shell-common_3.4.2-7+deb7u1.log
wheezy2proposed/fail/kde-plasma-desktop_5:77+deb7u1.log
wheezy2proposed/fail/kde-plasma-netbook_5:77+deb7u1.log
wheezy2proposed/fail/ltsp-server-standalone_5.4.2-6+deb7u1.log
wheezy2proposed/fail/sucrose-0.96_0.96.1-2.1.log

(not yet rescheduled)

> and some more things:
> 
> squeeze2squeeze-lts should be listed above squeeze

where?


> htdocs/index.tpl still contains a reference to the "bikeshed" branch

yes, as a historic reference to some event 2013-05-13. changed it to say "we 
used" instead of "we use"...

> distros.conf: why does squeeze-lts have an uri? that should be able to
> use the default mirror

fixed, committed + pushed.

> busy with filing bugs, no time to write code :-)

I very much appreciated your recent bug wave(s) (totally awesome!) and also 
this mail but I would have even more enjoyed to get those three small changes 
as patches. These changes are so tiny, that's not writing code ;-) Anyhow, 
glad you send the mail!

And, btw, don't you happen to have some unfinished multiple-arch support 
patches laying around somewhere? I strongly remember you said so once... or is 
my memory faulty here?
And even if they were not ready for publication, I'd be glad if I could at 
least have a (private) look at them.. i really want to get multi-arch going 
soon..! :-)

Thanks!


cheers,
	Holger
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 828 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/piuparts-devel/attachments/20141109/4cdd722f/attachment.sig>