[Piuparts-devel] Please requeue XCA 2.1.2-3 tests

[Thomas Ward]

Will do, thanks for looking at this and getting back to me.

'Tis a shame that piuparts-git had some headaches from the changes, but 
at least the 'breakage' was identified and fixed, and thankfully none of 
the packages on my radar are failing piuparts tests anymore.

If I see any more failing on the same issue, I'll let you know. Thanks!


Thomas


On 1/17/20 10:43 AM, Nicolas Dandrimont wrote:
> * Thomas Ward <teward at ubuntu.com> [2020-01-07 13:50:54 -0500]:
>
>> Hello.
>>
>> Due to piuparts breakage found over the holiday time periods, we had
>> discovered a breakage in piuparts where it fails to properly handle the rest
>> of the 'system' objects in its comparison.  This was ultimately fixed, and
>> for many packages a requeue fixed the issue.
>>
>> However, this issue still is showing for piuparts data on piuparts.d.o for
>> my other package, xca, which has an update to fix a FTCBFS issue.  This
>> piuparts run is still failing, but because the cause of the failure is known
>> to be because of the issue in piuparts.git, I'd like to request that the xca
>> 2.1.2-3 piuparts test be requeued and rerun.
> Hi!
>
> [I've just started looking after piuparts.d.o a few days ago, and it's taking
> me a while to get up to speed; sorry for the inconvenience in the mean time!]
>
> I've poked at things a bit a few days ago (making one of the piuparts workers
> look at sid only), so this should have happened by now. (looks like xca has
> indeed migrated to testing in the meantime).
>
> Feel free to let us know if there's still packages stuck behind a piuparts
> false positive.
>
> Cheers,
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/piuparts-devel/attachments/20200117/2de7e6ff/attachment.html>