[pkg-apparmor] [apparmor] [report] AppArmor BoF and discussions at DebConf14

[Jamie Strandboge]

On 09/22/2014 11:51 PM, intrigeri wrote:
>   
>   * We can try to convince Canonical's management to prioritize
>     upstreaming AppArmor kernel patches higher. We didn't really come
>     up with a clear decision or way to go about it, but it would be
>     good to see this happen somehow.
> 
This isn't so much convincing it is important-- it was time. This is already
starting based on this weeks Ubuntu Security team meeting:

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs/Security/20140922

...

>   * Regarding the policy: we agreed that on the long run, policies
>     should be shipped in the individual packages. We'll create a set
>     of usertags to track AppArmor -related bugs, and we'll inform
>     maintainers that we're happy to help them fix it. This is part of
>     an OPW project that was just submitted, by the way:
>     https://wiki.debian.org/OutreachProgramForWomen#AppArmor_profiles_for_widely_used_applications
> 
Excellent to hear. I've signed up for the mailing list and will keep an eye out
for where I can help.

Thanks for the update! :)

-- 
Jamie Strandboge                 http://www.ubuntu.com/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-apparmor-team/attachments/20140923/ad467950/attachment.sig>