[pkg-apparmor] AppArmor user stories to create usertags for Debian BTS
intrigeri
intrigeri at debian.org
Thu Jan 22 16:17:51 UTC 2015
Hi,
u wrote (17 Jan 2015 20:04:10 GMT) :
> Holger Levsen:
>> "Feature: Ship an existing AppArmor profile in the same Debian package as the
>> confined software" is a bit redundant / strangely worded though, maybe better:
>> "Feature: Shipping software confined using an existing AppArmor profile
>> bundled in a Debian package"
> I agree that that's not easy, but I find your suggestion even more
> complicated and the initial one seems correct at least.
Agreed. Would any of the following be clearer?
"Ship an existing AppArmor profile confining software $S in the Debian
package that ships $S"
or
"Ship, in the Debian package that ships software $S, an existing
AppArmor profile to confine $S"
>> b.)
[...]
>> -> When I see an error, how do I know its a strange permission error?
> Finally, I changed that story, because seeing a permission error indeed
> is already part of the solution:
Indeed, I prefer the new version.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
More information about the pkg-apparmor-team
mailing list