[pkg-apparmor] AppArmor user stories to create usertags for Debian BTS

intrigeri intrigeri at debian.org
Thu Jan 22 16:17:51 UTC 2015


Hi,

u wrote (17 Jan 2015 20:04:10 GMT) :
> Holger Levsen:
>> "Feature: Ship an existing AppArmor profile in the same Debian package as the 
>> confined software" is a bit redundant / strangely worded though, maybe better: 
>> "Feature: Shipping software confined using an existing AppArmor profile 
>> bundled in a Debian package"

> I agree that that's not easy, but I find your suggestion even more
> complicated and the initial one seems correct at least.

Agreed. Would any of the following be clearer?

"Ship an existing AppArmor profile confining software $S in the Debian
package that ships $S"

or

"Ship, in the Debian package that ships software $S, an existing
AppArmor profile to confine $S"


>> b.)
[...]
>> -> When I see an error, how do I know its a strange permission error?

> Finally, I changed that story, because seeing a permission error indeed
> is already part of the solution:

Indeed, I prefer the new version.

Cheers,
-- 
intrigeri



More information about the pkg-apparmor-team mailing list