[pkg-apparmor] Bug#972880: apparmor-easyprof: Consider folding apparmor-easyprof back into apparmor-utils

[intrigeri]

Hi,

intrigeri at debian.org (2020-10-25):
> it seems to me we could simplify the packaging a bit by merging
> apparmor-easyprof into apparmor-utils.
>
> Looking at the Vcs-Git history, it seems that apparmor-easyprof was
> initially extracted as a separate package because it was the only
> consumer of the Python libraries. Now that all apparmor-utils
> are written in Python, this reason is moot.
>
> Jamie, did I miss a good reason to keep it separate?

I intend to give this a try, possibly soonish, in Debian experimental,
unless I'm told why this would be a bad idea :)

Note to myself: apparmor-easyprof ships a conffile so this change
requires doing the "take over conffile previously shipped by another
package" dance.

Cheers!