[pkg-bacula-devel] Bug#683080: Bug#683080: Bug#683080: Bug#683080: Bug#683080: bacula-fd: Please build with libcap-dev

[Alexander Golovko]

Yes, this option look what we need.
At least, bacula-fd binary, builded with this option, don't linked to
libcap.

But something was wrong, when i simply add LDFLAGS into debian/rules -
it has no effect, so i still need more time.

В Fri, 10 Aug 2012 17:09:08 +0200
Elrond <elrond+bugs.debian.org at samba-tng.org> пишет:

> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 15:55:39 +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
> [...]
> > > In a perfect world it would only add this dependency to
> > > bacula-fd.
> > > Possibly an upstream wishlist bug?
> > 
> > IMHO this is not a wishlist bug, we have plenty of such unneeded
> > linking in Bacula, see:
> > 
> >   <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=646730#31>
> 
> What's about the -Wl,--as-needed?
> That should help, I'd guess?
> 
> 
> > > That said, libcap2 is on many systems anyway and probably
> > > wouldn't hurt on the director or a storage server a lot.
> > 
> > libcap2 is a dependency for ntp, not essential (standard), but still
> > IMHO highly recommended in a backup infrastructure (you want all
> > your machines to be synchronized WRT time).  And its
> > Installed-Size: is only 55k on sid, so adding it *where it is
> > needed* is not a problem.
> 
> ACK.
> 
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Elrond
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pkg-bacula-devel mailing list
> pkg-bacula-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-bacula-devel
> 
> 


-- 
with best regards,
Alexander Golovko
email: alexandro at ankalagon.ru
xmpp: alexandro at ankalagon.ru