[pkg-bacula-devel] Bug#805306: Would be nice to have a bacula-fd-legacy...

Anthony DeRobertis anthony at derobert.net
Fri Dec 4 01:42:33 UTC 2015

Package: bacula-fd
Version: 7.0.5+dfsg-2
Followup-For: Bug #805306

Hash: SHA1

I confess I don't know how much work it'd be, but it'd be nice to keep
around the older version of the file daemon as a separate package.
Clients running a newer version (e.g., testing) than the server can't be
that weird. I think it hasn't really been an issue before because the
5.x file daemon (as in, e.g., jessie) can talk to a much older director
& storage daemon. At least back to 3.0.2!

Having a bacula-fd-legacy, bacula-fd-old, or whatever package woud be nice.

- -- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (130, 'unstable'), (120, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.1.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages bacula-fd depends on:
ii  bacula-common  7.0.5+dfsg-2
ii  libacl1        2.2.52-2
ii  libc6          2.19-22
ii  libcap2        1:2.24-12
ii  libgcc1        1:5.2.1-23
ii  liblzo2-2      2.08-1.2
ii  libssl1.0.2    1.0.2d-3
ii  libstdc++6     5.2.1-23
ii  libwrap0       7.6.q-25
ii  lsb-base       9.20150917
ii  ucf            3.0030
ii  zlib1g         1:1.2.8.dfsg-2+b1

bacula-fd recommends no packages.

bacula-fd suggests no packages.

- -- no debconf information

Version: GnuPG v1


More information about the pkg-bacula-devel mailing list