[pkg-bacula-devel] Packaging private libbaculas3?

Sven Hartge sven at svenhartge.de
Fri Jun 12 17:30:23 BST 2020


On 12.06.20 17:22, Carsten Leonhardt wrote:

>> With libs3 in Debian not going anywhere, maybe we should package a
>> private libbaculas3 just for us, residing in /usr/lib/$ARCH/bacula to
>> get the cloud-driver working, because people clearly want to use it,
>> judging from the mails on bacula-user.

> in principle yes, but we'll have to check if it's ok to have two version
> of the same software in the archive...

I think the current libs3 should be removed as it is unusable, as far as
I can see, because it should not longer be compatible with the current
S3 API.

It also has no reverse depends, so removal would be without consequences.

Also with libbaculas3 being private to Bacula should make the argument
easier.

Grüße,
Sven.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-bacula-devel/attachments/20200612/fad149d7/attachment.sig>


More information about the pkg-bacula-devel mailing list