[pkg-boinc-devel] RFS: BOINC

Steffen Moeller moeller at inb.uni-luebeck.de
Wed Dec 21 14:29:35 UTC 2005


Thank you for your kind and informative reply, Frank.

You may be right. Google did not know anything in this respect. The only 
comment I could add is that the removal of unneeded redundant libraries or 
provided binaries is a standard procedure that should be applied for all the 
packages and is also part of the minor issues list of the package rejection 
check list.

In our case, it is that standard procedure that renders a DFSG-problematic 
distribution a DFSG-compliant one. 

My guts fealing is - leave it.

Many greetings

Steffen

Am Mittwoch 21 Dezember 2005 02:16 schrieb Frank S. Thomas:
> On Tuesday 20 December 2005 09:57, Steffen Moeller wrote:
> > > A remaining question is if we should add a .dfsg. suffix to the tarball
> > > name, because the export-boinc script, which is used to create the
> > > tarballs, removes some non-free and unneeded stuff from the CVS export.
> > > For example it removes the build systems for mac and windows, because
> > > these include binary files without their sources or have non-free
> > > licenses. And also copies of cURL, OpenSSL and zlib are removed - we
> > > build depend on the respective packages and having those copies in the
> > > tarball is a waste of space.
> >
> > Hm. I think that this is not required since you only remove stuff from
> > the distribution without changing the functionality
>
> At least not for Debian users. Rebuilding BOINC for Mac OS or Windows is
> probably not possible with our tarball.
>
> > and do you do not actively
> > patch the source in order to be using something compatible to upstream.
>
> It isn't my impression that this is a "requirement" for using the .dfsg.
> suffix. I thought it just means: "This is a repackaged orig.tar.gz without
> some files, due to their DFSG incompatibility." We don't repackage any
> orig.tar.gz, because upstream provides none, but we are removing non-free
> content from the CVS export. Adding the .dfsg. suffix would make clear that
> our tarballs do not contain a pristine CVS export.
> Hence, my suggestion is to add the .dfsg. suffix.
>
> > Have you contacted
> > upstream with the suggestion to leave the external libraries aside?
>
> No, I think it's easier for them to build BOINC on systems where
> installation of packages is not as easy as "apt-get install <packages>"
> (Windows, Mac OS) if these libs are part of the CVS checkout.
>
> Grüße,
> Frank

-- 

Dr. Steffen Möller
University of Lübeck
Institute of Neuro- and Bioinformatics
Ratzeburger Allee 160
23538 Lübeck
Germany
T: +49 451 500 5504
F: +49 451 500 5502
moeller at inb.uni-luebeck.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-boinc-devel/attachments/20051221/1e0684ba/attachment.pgp


More information about the pkg-boinc-devel mailing list