[Pkg-citadel-devel] webcit_7.42-dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Mike O'Connor
ftpmaster at debian.org
Fri Mar 6 07:18:06 UTC 2009
Hi maintainer,
REJECT: undistributable mix of licenses, insufficient debian/copyright
Sorry, but I must reject this package at this time. I found many problems with
the package after only going through about half of the files before running out
of time.
./webserver.c, says:
This program is released under the terms of the GNU General Public License v3
(other similar notices in ./po/da.po, README.txt
however debian/copyright is not referring to
/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-3. None of the lcense texts in
debian/copyright refer to GPL v3. he references to the gpl in
debian/copyright refer to version 2 or later.
--
./static/BubbleTooltips.js says:
* version is distributed as part of the Citadel system
* under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2.
This is a problem in that GPLv3 is not compatible with GPLv2. If
this is GPLv2 and we have code which is GPLv3 or GPLv3+, this is not
redistributable.
Also, this file being GPLv2 only is not mentioned in debian/copyright
--
./static/dragdrop.js says:
// (c) 2005-2007 Sammi Williams (http://www.oriontransfer.co.nz, sammi at oriontransfer.co.nz)
but Sammi Williams is not mentioned in debian/copyright
--
./static/datepicker-dev.js says:
* (c) 2007 Mathieu Jondet <mathieu at eulerian.com>
* DatePicker is freely distributable under the same terms as Prototype.
Mathieu Jondet is not mentioned in debian/copyright
--
./static/slider.js says:
// Copyright (c) 2005-2007 Marty Haught, Thomas Fuchs
but Marty Haught is not mentioned in debian/copyright
--
./static/controls.js says:
// (c) 2005-2007 Ivan Krstic (http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ivan)
// (c) 2005-2007 Jon Tirsen (http://www.tirsen.com)
neither of these copyright holders is mentioned in debian/copyright.
------
More minor things:
./static/scriptaculous.js says:
// Copyright (c) 2005-2007 Thomas Fuchs (http://script.aculo.us, http://mir.aculo.us)
so the copyright notice in debian/copyright should expand the years covered for Thomas Fuchs.
---
upstream should be notified of the mistakes in many of the po files:
"# This file is distributed under the same license as the PACKAGE package."
They probably mean "Citadel package" or "webcit package", or something similar.
bye,
stew
===
If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the
override file requires editing, reply to this email.
More information about the Pkg-citadel-devel
mailing list