[Pkg-clamav-devel] Should we try to get 0.94.dfsg.2-1 into lenny?

Michael Tautschnig mt at debian.org
Sun Dec 7 21:07:51 UTC 2008

> On Wednesday 03 December 2008 00:12, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> > We could bring this up with the release-team and/or ftp-masters, but
> > personally I don't see the volatile-only approach as a really doable
> > approach.
> I think it'd be much more useful to get some relaxation on post-release 
> updates to the main archive.  This is what we've done in Ubuntu and it's 
> worked very well.  It takes testing and coordination to get it done though.
> We're just starting to gear up to push from 0.92 to 0.94 in our earlier 
> releases.  We've got 0.92 in releases as much as a year and a half old.  It's 
> not completely current, but still workable.

Hmm, could it be that it will work out through stable-proposed-updates? I'm not
sure whether the SRMs will accept such large updates, though. Does one of the
more experienced DDs have an idea about this?


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-clamav-devel/attachments/20081207/677fb2a0/attachment.pgp 

More information about the Pkg-clamav-devel mailing list