[Pkg-clamav-devel] bug #500416
Michael Tautschnig
mt at debian.org
Mon Sep 29 14:57:12 UTC 2008
> This one time, at band camp, Michael Meskes said:
> > On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 08:09:15PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > > release. clamav-daemon probably needs to be more closely coupled to it
> > > in terms of versioned dependencies, but I'm having a hard time figuring
> > > out how to do it in an automated manner. We can of course do something
> > > like:
> > >
> > > Depends: clamav-base >=(0.94)
> > > Conflicts: clamav-base (0.95)
> > >
> > > and then increment the numbers with each release, but that feels really
> > > fragile to me.
> >
> > Is there a reason to not use a dependency on "clamav-base (= ${binary:Version})"?
>
> Doesn't that break binNMU's? Maybe that's ok, but that was why I
> changed it away from a strict = at some point. I could be wrong, and I
> could also be being cautious when I don't need to.
AFAIK ${binary:Version} is ok, ${source:Version} was the variable one shouldn't
use.
Best,
Michael
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-clamav-devel/attachments/20080929/d0f8518f/attachment.pgp
More information about the Pkg-clamav-devel
mailing list