[Pkg-clamav-devel] The future of clamav wrt. stable/volatile

[aCaB]

Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> There is just a slightly archive-specific problem: A package in main must not
> depend on something outside main (at least so I guess, I couldn't find the docs
> stating this rightaway). We'd thus need some clamav package in main, and not
> only in volatile. Which more or less is the situation we have today.

Mmmmk, then forget what i've said. It indeed doesn't make much sense
anymore.

> To me, the approach of moving clamav + all its rdepends to volatile really looks
> like the only option.

Yeah, I agree.

-acab