[Pkg-clamav-devel] The future of clamav wrt. stable/volatile

Michael Tautschnig mt at debian.org
Sat Jan 31 11:56:43 UTC 2009

> > 
> > We had discussed this during the Security Team meeting in Essen: We believe
> > clamav shouldn't be included in stable; malware scan engines are a constantly
> > moving target and it's pointless to backport changes since new signatures
> > constantly require new scan engine features all the time. So moving it to
> > volatile is the best solution for everyone.
> Ehm, its not a solution for me to move dansguardian to volatile only. It
> guess that counts for other applications that link against clamav too.

Would you mind adding the rationale why this is not a solution for you? I'm not
claiming that moving to volatile indeed is a solution, but getting some more
insight would be nice.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-clamav-devel/attachments/20090131/3895c698/attachment.pgp 

More information about the Pkg-clamav-devel mailing list