[Pkg-clamav-devel] Another upload?

[Michael Tautschnig]

> On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 03:35:15 +0000 Stephen Gran <sgran at debian.org> wrote:
> >Hey everyone,
> >
> >I just did some upgrade testing, and did some fixups for the various
> >hiccups I found while testing various things.  Since all of these are
> >pretty clearly low hanging fruit that will hit people doing an upgrade
> >or a fresh install, what do people think about another upload?
> >
> >I know that ideally we'd wait for the fixed templates for the milter,
> >but I think it's probably better to have a clean upgrade path than to
> >wait for better language at this point.
> >
> >We should also start thinking about volatile - I'll take a look at what
> >can be cherry-picked onto that branch.
> 
> I have a couple of inputs I'll try to get you in the morning.
> 

I'm all for another upload, but I'd like to discuss a few bits of last night's
patches - I'm online on IRC, which is probably more suitable for quick Q&A.

Volatile: yes, definitely, but I'd like to see the new packages mature a few
days before doing a volatile upload. What about rdepends - aren't we going to
break these?

And while we are at it: Should I mail to debian-release to request binNMUs of
our rdepends?

Thanks,
Michael

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-clamav-devel/attachments/20090327/e4591612/attachment.pgp