[Pkg-clamav-devel] [SRM] clamav 0.94.x EOL

Scott Kitterman debian at kitterman.com
Thu Oct 8 12:31:49 UTC 2009


On Thu, 8 Oct 2009 12:25:51 +0200 Tomasz Papszun <tomek at lodz.tpsa.pl> wrote:
>On Wed, 07 Oct 2009 at 14:47:21 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
>> Just in case the stable release managers what to do something about it
>> and don't know about this yet, clamav upstream are taking some
>> interesting measures to "encourage" people to upgrade from the now
>> EOLed 0.94.x series. The mail isn't fully clear, but it seems that
>> clamav 0.94.x will not work at all from April 15th 2010 and will not
>> recieve signature updates from May 2010, so I guess removal from
>> stable/oldstable is in order as well as an announcement of some sort
>> (DSA perhaps?).
>> 
>> http://lurker.clamav.net/message/20091006.143601.d27bbd20.en.html
>> 
>
>Sorry, it may seem a little harsh, but the reason is that unless the 
>majority of ClamAV users upgrade to >= 0.95.x, old freshclams will put 
>an excessive load on ClamAV database mirrors and that will harm *all* 
>of ClamAV users, not only the ones running old versions.
>
Personally, I appreciate having significant advance notice so we can do 
something to prepare.

I do not think removal is the approach that would be best for users.  It 
would leave them with an orhpaned, non-working package and they will have 
to upgrade systems to a newer release, install from external sources (e.g. 
volatile), or compile from dource directly.

Updating clamav and needed rdepends to something that upstream supports 
would be more benificial for users.  With a half a year of notice, I think 
this is managable.

This is the approach Ubuntu will be taking (they already have a full set of 
updates in their backport repository that is tested and almost ready).

Scott K



More information about the Pkg-clamav-devel mailing list