[Pkg-clamav-devel] Downgrading priority of clamav to "extra"?
debian at kitterman.com
Tue Jan 18 22:57:26 UTC 2011
"Michael Tautschnig" <mt at debian.org> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> As per  I reviewed the current priority of clamav and its
>dependency and it
>> seems we are now relying on at least one package, libtommath, which
>> extra only.
>> As clamav IMHO matches the definition "likely to be useful if you
>> what they are" I would opt for downgrading the priority of clamav
>> asking libtommath maintainers to upgrade their priority.
>> Do others agree with this suggestion or would you have objections?
>Sorry, forgot to add the link:
I think it's better to leave it optional since it's the primary (only?) anti-virus package in the archive. There are other optional packages that use libtomath that would benefit from it being made optional.
More information about the Pkg-clamav-devel