[Pkg-clamav-devel] Bug#617444: clamav: (PRSC) Please backport fix for CVE-2011-1003

[Michael Tautschnig]

Hi again,

[...]
> > Minimal testing of the squeeze-specific build has been performed; the same
> > version, although built for lenny-volatile, is being "tested" in
> > production environments. I'm now uploading to squeeze-updates.
> 
> Unfortunately, the upload got rejected by dak.
> 
> Please could you re-upload using "stable" as the distribution. 
> "squeeze-updates" is not intended as a direct upload target.
> 

Fixed and re-uploading just now. Is that use of distribution names documented
anywhere? I had taken a look at tzdata, which indeed uses "stable", but
according to [1] all these are equivalent and I found squeeze-updates to be much
more descriptive, hence used that one.

Another related question: should one send a working draft of an update
announcement to somewhere? I'm used to doing that for volatile, but don't know
about the procedures for stable-updates.

Best regards,
Michael

[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2011/03/msg00007.html

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-clamav-devel/attachments/20110315/22bc5d53/attachment-0001.pgp>